Allahabad High Court
WRIA/16717/2026 of PAPPU Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 8 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16717 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record on Board. 2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 16717 of 2026
Court No. - 32
HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record on Board.
2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to regularize the services of the petitioner as Safai Karmchari in Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad."
3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondents no.1 & 2 and Shri Raghuvansh Misra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents no.3 & 4 have contended that the grievance of the petitioner, as raised in the instant writ petition, can be more appropriately redressed by the Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad (respondent no.3) and that they have no objection if a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of a fresh representation, to be moved by the present petitioner, within such stipulated period, as may be directed by this Court.
4. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Accordingly, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, with liberty to the present petitioner to move a fresh representation with respect to his grievances, as raised in this petition, within a period of three weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order and a self attested copy of the instant writ petition before the respondent no.3, who, in turn, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of the same. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sakshi Srivastava, Shikhar Neelkanth Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Raghuvansh Misra Pappu .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. With the aforesaid directions, instant writ petition stands finally disposed of. October 9, 2026 VR WRIA No. 16717 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA RATAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad