Allahabad High Court
WRIA/16733/2026 of VIJAY Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 8 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16733 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record on Board. 2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs:- " A . Issue a writ of mandamus commanding
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 16733 of 2026
Court No. - 32
HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record on Board.
2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs:- "A. Issue a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 5 to regularize the services of petitioner on the post of sweeper (Safai Karmchari) i.e. IV employee. B. Issue a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent no.5 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 09.09.2026 within stipulated period."
3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondents no.1 to 3 and Shri Girdhar Prasad Tripathi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents no.4 & 5, have contended that the grievance of the petitioner regarding non-regularization of his service can be more appropriately redressed by the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Shahabad, Rampur ( respondent no.5) and that they have no objection if a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of a fresh representation, to be moved by the present petitioner, within such stipulated period, as may be directed by this Court.
4. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Accordingly, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, with liberty to the present petitioner to move a fresh representation with respect to his grievances, as raised in this petition, within a period of three weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order and a self attested copy of the instant writ petition before the respondent no.5, who, in turn, shall consider and decide the same in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Girdhar Prasad Tripathi Vijay .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of the same.
5. With the aforesaid directions, instant writ petition stands finally disposed of. October 9, 2026 VR WRIA No. 16733 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA RATAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad