Allahabad High Court
CRLP/19118/2025 of SMT SANJO AND 5 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 8 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19118 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. 2. Even though the names of Mr. Ved Ratan is duly published in the cause list as counsel for petitioners but neither
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19118 of 2025
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J.
HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Case called out in revised list.
2. Even though the names of Mr. Ved Ratan is duly published in the cause list as counsel for petitioners but neither he nor anyone on his behalf is present to press the present writ petition even in revised call.
3. Learned AGA representing State-respondents-1, 2 and 3 is present.
4. Petitioners Smt. Sanjo and five others have approached this Court by means of present Criminal Misc. Writ Petition, challenging the impugned FIR dated 18.08.2025, lodged by first informant-respondent-4, Rajnesh and registered as Case Crime No. 227 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 61(2) BNS, Police Station Dando, District Aligarh.
5. On the matter being taken up, the learned A.G.A. representing State- respondents-1, 2 and 3 submits that during pendency of present writ petition, Investigating Officer, upon completion of statutory investigation of aforementioned case crime number, in terms of Chapter XIII BNSS, has submitted police report/final report in terms of Section 193(3) BNSS.
6. In view of above, present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. It is accordingly dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
7. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated. October 9, 2026 Monika Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ved Ratan Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Smt Sanjo And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MONIKA KESARWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad