Allahabad High Court
WRIC/32032/2026 of MANJUR HASAN AND ANOTHER Vs GRAM SABHA KATKAULA GAUSPUR AND 8 OTHERS on 8 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32032 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj as respondent no.6 in the array of the parties to the writ petition during course of the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 32032 of 2026
Court No. - 37
HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj as respondent no.6 in the array of the parties to the writ petition during course of the day.
2. Heard Mr. Shivanshu Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Ajay Kumar Baranwal, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents and Mr. Azad Rai, learned counsel for the Gram Sabha.
3. The instant petition has been filed for mandamus directing the respondent no.6/ Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj to decide Revenue Appeal No.621 of 2025 (Manjur Hasan and Another vs. Gram Sabha Kathula Gospur and others) within stipulated period.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the appeal under Section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 filed on behalf of petitioner arising out of suit proceeding, under Section 144 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending before respondent no.6/ Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj since 6.3.2025. He further submitted that the copy of order sheet of the case has been annexed as Annexure No.2 to the petition in order to demonstrate that the case is not proceeding expeditiously.
5. Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case and keeping in view of the facts and circumstances, respondent no.6 is directed to decide the aforementioned case after giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sameer Srivastava, Shivanshu Mehta Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Manjur Hasan And Another .....Petitioner(s) Gram Sabha Katkaula Gauspur And 8 Others .....Respondent(s)
before him.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is finally disposed of. October 9, 2026 Rameez WRIC No. 32032 of 2026 2 (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMEEZ AHMED High Court of Judicature at Allahabad