Central Government Industrial Tribunal

CGIT1 Delhi Order dated 21.07.2025 passed in the Matter of ID No. 211/2017 The General Secretary v.s Airport Authority of India. on 21 July 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL

CUM LABOUR COURT DELHI - 1,

NEW DELHI.

ID No.211/2017

The General Secretary, Indian Airports Kamgar Union(IAKU), Qtr. No. B-140, Pocket-A, INA Colony, New Delhi-110023.

…Claimant

Versus

The Regional Director (NR), M/s Airport Authority of India, Operational Offices, Rangpuri, New Delhi-110037.

…Management

AWARD

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. In the present case, a reference was received from the appropriate Government vide letter No-L-11011/5/2017-IR(M) dated 20.07.2017 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Act, for adjudication of a dispute, terms of which are as under: The Schedule ‘Whether the demand of the Indian Airports Kamgar Union from the management of Airports Authority of India to withdraw he transfer order No. F. No. AAI/AT/FS/F-60/2016-EW/1569-1614 dated 24.05.2016 and office order No. AAI/RHQ-NR/AT/FS- 60/Attachment/EW/2016/1555-1568 dated 20.05.2016 and the transfer of employees mentioned therein, is illegal and/or unjustified and if so to what relived\s are the workmen entitled?’

2. In the reference order, the appropriate Government commanded the parties raising the dispute to file statement of claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within 15 days of receipt of the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to the opposite parties involved in the dispute. Claim statement was filed on behalf of the claimant.

3. Rebuttal written statement was also filed by the management. Thereafter, none appeared on behalf of the claimant to substantiate his claim.

4. Hence, in these circumstances this tribunal has no option except to pass the no dispute award. No dispute award is passed accordingly. File is consigned to the record room. A copy of this award is hereby send to the appropriate government for notification under section 17 of the I.D. Act, 1947.

Date: 21.07.2025

ATUL KUMAR GARG

Presiding Officer

CGIT – cum – Labour Court – I

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead