Allahabad High Court

NA529/4825/2026 of PRAMOD KUMAR Vs VIKASH UPADHYAY on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4825 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed to direct the court concerned to decide the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4825 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed to direct the court concerned to decide the Case No. 9292/2024 ( Pramod Kumar vs. Vikash Upadhayay), under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, Police Station Bisrakh District Gautam Buddh Nagar, pending before the court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division)/FTC, Court No. 9, Gautam Budh Nagar, expeditiously within a stipulated period. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the said case is pending since 2024. It is further submitted that as per Section 143 (3) of the N.I. Act it should be disposed of within a period of six months from the date of filing of the complaint but more than a year has been passed from the date of filing of the complaint, but till date nothing has been done. A prayer has been made to direct the court concerned to decide the aforesaid case as per Section 143 (3) of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, the court concerned is directed to make all endeavours to decide the aforesaid case as per Section 143 (3) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, after giving opportunity of hearing to both the parties, without giving any unnecessary adjournments to either parties, if there is no other legal impediment in deciding the aforesaid case. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Kumar, Neetu Singh, Shreyansi Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :

Pramod Kumar .....Applicant(s) Vikash Upadhyay .....Opposite Party(s)

With the aforesaid observations, the instant application is finally disposed of. October 9, 2026 Brijesh NA529 No. 4825 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead