Allahabad High Court

A227/5777/2015 of MOHD. IBRAHIM Vs ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AND 5 OTHERS on 8 October 2026

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5777 of 2015 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This is a plaintiff's petition. In the suit filed by the plaintiff, an application for grant of temporary injunction (6-C) was moved which was refused by both the Courts below.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5777 of 2015

Court No. - 9

HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

1. This is a plaintiff's petition. In the suit filed by the plaintiff, an application for grant of temporary injunction (6-C) was moved which was refused by both the Courts below.

2. Having gone through material on record, I find that no interference is required by this Court in the order impugned.

3. Writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. October 9, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : S. Shanawaz Shah, Smt. Farida Jamal Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ghanshyam Pandey, Pradeep Kumar Tiwari (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Mohd. Ibrahim .....Petitioner(s) Additional District Judge And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead