Allahabad High Court

BAIL/36178/2026 of MOHAMMAD YUSUF Vs STATE OF U.P. on 8 October 2026

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36178 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Yawar Mukhtar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36178 of 2026

Court No. - 68

HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.

1. List has been revised.

2. Heard Sri Yawar Mukhtar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.117 of 2026, U/S 9B, 9C Explosives Act, 1884, U/S 4(b) Explosive Substances Act, 1908, U/S 5/25 Arms Act, 1958 & U/S 288 B.N.S. Police Station Heeempur Deepa, District Bijnor, during the pendency of trial.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is a labourer at Bajrang Fire Works and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The allegations are per se false. The actual allegation is that the said factory was having explosives in excess of the allocated quantity. The criminal history of one case assigned to the applicant stands explained. He and is in jail since 14.09.2026 and undertakes to cooperate with the trial and not misuse the liberty of bail.

5. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application but the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant could not be disputed.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, and without Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Yawar Mukhtar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Mohammad Yusuf .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

Page 1 of 2

expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

7. Let the applicant- Mohammad Yusuf, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required.

8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. October 9, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 36178 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead