Allahabad High Court

A227/457/2016 of SMT. SHANTI @ SATIYA Vs VISHWANATH AND 5 OTHERS on 8 October 2026

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 457 of 2016 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Case is called out. No one is present to press the writ petition. 2. Sri Arvind Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent is present. 3. After hearing counsel for the respondent

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 457 of 2016

Court No. - 9

HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

1. Case is called out. No one is present to press the writ petition.

2. Sri Arvind Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent is present.

3. After hearing counsel for the respondent and going through material available on record, I find that no interference is required in the order impugned, as the issues no.3, 4 and 5 have been decided against the petitioner, against which, a misc appeal has been filed which has also been dismissed.

4. Writ petition is misconceived and the same stands dismissed. October 9, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anupam Laloriya, Pankaj Saksena Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arvind Srivastava, Pushkar Srivastava (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Smt. Shanti @ Satiya .....Petitioner(s) Vishwanath And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead