Allahabad High Court

CRLP/23140/2026 of VIKAS AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 8 October 2026

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23140 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 12.09.2026 in Case Crime No.466 of

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23140 of 2026

Court No. - 48

HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

1. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 12.09.2026 in Case Crime No.466 of 2026, under Sections 127 (2), 115 (2), 352, 351 (3), 125 of BNS and Section 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha, 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act, at Police Station Bahjoi, District Sambhal and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners after some length of arguments on merits made an innocuous prayer that before arresting the petitioners police may be directed to follow the principle laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273.

3. Per contra, Mr. K.P. Pathak, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of State vehemently opposed the petition on merits but he has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners.

4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the record.

5. Taking into consideration the submissions and prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and no objection by learned A.G.A. on innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, we are inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nagendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Vikas And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

Page 1 of 2

6. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the authorities concerned to ensure the procedure of arrest as per the guidelines of the Supreme Court enshrined in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273 and provision of Section 35(3) of B.N.S.S. October 9, 2026 C. MANI CRLP No. 23140 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead