WRIA/16727/2026 of SURENDRA NATH MISHRA Vs DIRECTOR, RAJYA KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI PARISHAD AND ANOTHER on 8 October 2026

1. Shri Shashi Kant Srivastava, learned Advocate, has filed memo of appearance on behalf of respondent no.2, today before the Court, which is taken on record. Office is directed to proceed accordingly and print his name as counsel for the respondents.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record on Board.

3. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs:- "i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authorities to pay house rent allowance and difference in CPF to the petitioner forthwith.

ii. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.2 to decide the application of the petitioner dated 24.08.2026 within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court."

4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.1 and Shri Shashi Kant Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.2, have contended that the grievance of the petitioner regarding non-payment of house rent allowance and difference in C.P.F., as raised in the instant writ petition, can be more appropriately redressed by the Secretary, Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Shahjahanpur (respondent no.2) and that they have no objection if a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of a fresh representation, to be moved by the present petitioner, within such stipulated period, as may be directed by this Court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pawankumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Archit Mandhyan Surendra Nath Mishra .....Petitioner(s) Director, Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad And Another .....Respondent(s)

5. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Accordingly, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, with liberty to the present petitioner to move a fresh representation with respect to his grievances, as raised in this petition, within a period of three weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order and a self attested copy of the instant writ petition before the respondent no.2, who, in turn, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of the same.

6. With the aforesaid directions, instant writ petition stands finally disposed of. October 9, 2026 VR WRIA No. 16727 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA RATAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad