Allahabad High Court
WRIC/39482/2026 of FAIZ ANWAR Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39482 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 39482 of 2026
Court No. - 1
HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for following relief as substantial relief: "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent authorities, particularly respondent nos.3, to ensure that the petitioner is not illegally or arbitrarily obstructed in transportation/loading of buffaloes, subject to his strict compliance with all applicable statutory provisions, rules and directions issued by the competent authorities;
II. Issue a writ, order or direction commanding the respondent authorities to ensure that the petitioner is permitted to carry on transportation of buffaloes strictly in accordance with law and the applicable guidelines issued by the competent veterinary authorities;"
3. It appears from the records that the petitioner has already represented the matter to the respondent authority vide representation dated 27.07.2026 which is still pending consideration.
4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection in the event this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent authority to look into and consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Sadab Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Faiz Anwar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction that authority concerned shall consider the grievance of the petitioner raised in his representation and decide the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
6. Needless to add that the order to be passed by the competent authority, as directed herein above, shall be reasoned and speaking one. October 8, 2026 Kuldeep WRIC No. 39482 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad