Allahabad High Court
A227/1955/2011 of RAMBACHAN YADAV Vs VIJAI BAHADUR SINGH AND OTHERS on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1955 of 2011 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "( A ) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the court of Addl. Civil Judge
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1955 of 2011
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "(A) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the court of Addl. Civil Judge Junior Division, 4th Jaunpur to decide the Original Suit No.920 of 2000 Ram Bachan Yadav Vs. Vijay Bahadur Singh and others within the period which maybe fixed by this hon'ble court and further the respondents be directed to maintain status quo in respect of land in disputer till the disposal of Original Suit No.920 of 2000 Ram Bachan Yadav Vs. Vijay Bahadur Singh and others. (B) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the court of Addl. Civil Judge Junior Division, 4th Jaunpur to dispose of 6-C application dated 21-2-2009 and application dated 2-8- 2011 of petitioner filed in Original Suit No.920/2000 Ram Bachan Yadav vs. Vijay Bahadur Singh and others and till the disposal of the said applications the parties may be directed to maintain status quo in respect of land in dispute."
2. First prayer made in the writ petition cannot be granted in light of the judgment of Constitution Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others (2024) 6 SCC 267.
3. As far as second prayer for deciding the 6-C application is concerned, this Court finds that the petition is of the year 2011 and application for grant of temporary injunction are of the year 2009 and 2011 and almost Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : S.C. Rambachan Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Vijai Bahadur Singh And Others .....Respondent(s)
17 years have elapsed, by now, the said applications must have been decided.
4. In case, the said applications have not been decided, till date, the Court below shall make every endeavour to decide the said applications within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after hearing all the affected parties, strictly in accordance with law.
5. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. October 8, 2026 SK Goswami A227 No. 1955 of 2011 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad