Allahabad High Court

A227/13481/2026 of SADHANA SRIVASTAVA AND ANOTHER Vs KRISHNA PAL AND 3 OTHERS on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13481 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "I. Issue a order and direction in nature of Mandamus directing the court below i.e. Motor Accident Claim

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13481 of 2026

Court No. - 9

HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "I. Issue a order and direction in nature of Mandamus directing the court below i.e. Motor Accident Claim Tribunal- North, Prayagraj to fix a date for final hearing and conclude the hearing.

II. Issue a order or direction in nature mandamus directing the court below to decide the Claim Petition no. 136 of 2017 within a stipulated period as fixed by the this Hon'ble Court."

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that Motor Accident Claims Petition is pending consideration since 2017 before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.

3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, or calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to the private respondent, the matter is being disposed of, at the admission stage, with a direction upon Tribunal concerned to decide the pending Claim Petition no. 136 of 2017 after hearing all the concerned parties, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. October 8, 2026//(V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailendra Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anubhav Sinha (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Sadhana Srivastava And Another .....Petitioner(s) Krishna Pal And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead