Allahabad High Court
NABAIL/10212/2026 of YOGENDRA KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10212 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the records. 2. The present application has been
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
- 10212 of 2026
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the records.
2. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No. 264 of 2017, under Sections 420, 506 IPC, Police Station Singhawali Ahir, District Baghpat with a prayer to grant him anticipatory bail.
3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this application and move an appropriate application seeking regular bail before the concerned Court. He prays that a direction may be given to the concerned Court to decide the bail application expeditiously.
4. Learned AGA has no objection to the said prayer.
5. On the prayer made, it is provided that in case the applicant appears before the concerned court and applies for bail within four weeks from today, his application for bail shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law and in view of judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & Another, passed in S.L.P.(Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021.
6. For a period of four weeks from today or till filing of regular bail Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Mishra, Pradeep Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Yogendra Kumar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.
7. It is made clear that no further time shall be granted to comply with this order.
8. With these observations, the application is disposed of. October 8, 2026 Lalit Shukla NABAIL No. 10212 of 2026 2 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- LALIT KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad