Allahabad High Court

NA528/43754/2026 of SONU AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 43754 of 2026 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Sri Rajesh Kumar Nishad, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Abhishek Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Sri Chavi Pal Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 43754 of 2026 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Sri Rajesh Kumar Nishad, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Abhishek Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Sri Chavi Pal Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State are present. The present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 159 of 2025, arising out of Case Crime No. 278 of 2024, under Sections 363, 366, 376AB and 504 of I.P.C. and 5M/6 POCSO Act, Police Station- Jaithara, District- Etah, as well as cognizance/ summoning order dated 20.02.2025 pending in the Court of Special Judge (POCSO Act) /Additional Session Judge, Etah. Learned A.G.A. pointed out that date of birth of the victim is 01.01.2013 and the statement of the victim has been recorded before the trial court and the trial is on advance stage. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants does not want to press this application and wants liberty to file an appropriate application/ proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. Certified copy of the order may be returned to the learned counsel for the applicants after retaining a xerox thereof. In view of the above, the application is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. October 8, 2026 Ishan Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Kumar, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Sonu And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead