Allahabad High Court
NA529/4900/2026 of DIPAK KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4900 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. 2. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4900 of 2026
Court No. - 82
HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record.
2. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned for early disposal of Session Trial No. 191 of 2025 (State Vs. Mukesh Shukla and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 609 of 2024, under Sections- 3(5), 103(1), 115(2), 117(2) BNS and 3/25/27 Arms Act, Police Station- Banda, District- Shahajahanpur, pending before the court of District and Sessions Judge, Shahjahanpur.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the FIR of the present case has been lodged by the applicant on 10.9.2024 and till date statements of only P.W.1 and 2 have been record and the trial of the case is still pending.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law, keeping in view the provision of Section 309 Cr.P.C./346 BNSS, as expeditiously as possible, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no other legal impediment. October 8, 2026 KK Patel Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Kumar, Tej Bahadur Rai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Dipak Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHN KANT PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad