Allahabad High Court

CRLP/22241/2026 of M/S S P SAI IT PRIVATE LIMITED Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22241 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22241 of 2026

Court No. - 48

HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 13.12.2025 bearing Case Crime No. 710 of 2025 registered under Sections 406, 420, 323, 504 & 506 I.P.C.) P.S. Surajpur, District- Gautam Budh Nagar (Annexure No.1 to this writ petition);

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents not to arrest the directors and employees of the petitioner pursuant to the F.I.R. dated 13.12.2025 bearing Case Crime No. 710 of 2025 registered under Sections 406, 420, 323, 504 & 506 I.P.C.) P.S. Surajpur, District- Gautam Budh Nagar."

2. Learned A.G.A. has submitted that after completion of investigation, final report has been forwarded to the court concerned on 06.03.2026.

3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 4 and 5 submitted and prayed that the instant writ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. M/S S P Sai It Private Limited .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)

petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by learned A.G.A. as well as the fact that the parties concerned have already settled their dispute amicably outside the Court.

4. Heard Mr. Ashutosh Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Johari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 4 and 5, and perused the material on record.

5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that final report has already been forwarded and the parties concerned have settled their dispute outside the Court, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.

6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of. October 8, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 22241 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead