EPF matters orders dated 23.09.2025 CGIT-1 Delhi except item no. 1, 2 & 13 of the cause list which are uploaded separately on 23 September 2025

D-1/40/2025 M/s. Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi North.

Present: Sh. Shikhar Rusia, Ld. Counsel for the appellant.

Ms. Kavya Dixit, proxy for Sh. Kaushik Kumar Dey, Ld. Counsel

& Sh. A.S. Negi, A/R for the Respondent.

Order dated- 23.09.2025

This is a fresh appeal filed by the appellant assailing two orders passed under section 14B & 7Q of the EPF & MP Act, 1952 respectively whereby an amount of Rs.88,48,089/- is assessed as damages and Rs.46,55,577/- as interest for the belated payment of EPF dues during the period 01.09.2022 to 31.03.2024.

Perusal of the office report reveals that the appeal is filed within time, hence, admitted for hearing. Along with the appeal, the appellant has filed a misc. application seeking stay.

The proxy counsel appearing on behalf of Sh. Kaushik Kumar Dey has filed the vakalatnama. She further seeks time to file reply to the misc. application for granting stay as well as to the main appeal.

Put up the matter on 14.10.2025 for filing of reply to the misc. application as well as to the appeal. In the meanwhile, respondent is restrained from any taking coercive action till further order.

D-1/80/2024 M/s. Biocon Electric Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi East.

Present: Sh. Siddharth Jha, proxy Counsel for the appellant.

Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Deepak Kumar, A/R

for the Respondent.

Order dated- 23.09.2025

The proxy counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant seeks more time to file rejoinder. In the interest of justice, prayer to grant more time is allowed. Put up the case on 29.10.2025 for filing of rejoinder.

D-1/06/2025 M/s. Gears & Gears vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi North.

Present: Sh. Kumar Vikram, ld. counsel for the appellant.

Sh. B.B. Pradhan, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Ashutosh Kr. Singh for the

Respondent.

Order dated- 23.09.2025

The reply to this appeal stands filed on behalf of the respondent. Ld. Counsel for the counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant seeks time to file rejoinder. He further submitted that he was under the impression that counter reply is yet to be filed. A copy of reply is supplied to him today. In the interest of justice, prayer to grant time is allowed. Put up the case on 24.10.2025 for filing of rejoinder.

D-1/13/2025 M/s. Takshila Public School Education Society vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi East.

Present: Sh. Siddharth Jha, proxy Counsel for the appellant.

Sh. Tejaswi Goel, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.

Order dated- 23.09.2025

Ld. Counsel for the appellant seeks more time to file rejoinder. Let this case be listed for final arguments on 27.10.2025. In the meanwhile, appellant is directed to file the rejoinder within two weeks along with supplying advance copy to the respondent.

D-1/28/2025 M/s. Skoda India Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi Central.

Present: Sh. Anubhav Shukla, proxy Counsel for the appellant.

Sh. B.B. Pradhan, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.

Order dated- 23.09.2025

Ld. Counsel for the respondent seeks more time to file the reply. In the interest of justice, prayer to grant more time is allowed. Put up the case on 28.10.2025 for filing of reply.

919(4)2012 M/s. Jhalani Tools India Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi.

Present: Sh. Chetan Singh, proxy Counsel for the appellant. Sh. Chakradhar Panda, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Ashutosh Kumar Singh, A/R for the Respondent.

Order dated- 23.09.2025

The proxy counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant seeks more time to argue the matter on the misc. application filed by and on behalf of the respondent. In the interest of justice, prayer to grant more time is allowed. Put up the case on 28.10.2025 to argue the matter on the misc. application.

At this stage, ld. Counsel for the respondent, Sh. Chakradhar Panda mentioned that his presence has not been marked in the order sheet dated 27.08.2025. Let his presence be noted in the last date of hearing i.e. on 27.08.2025.

716(4)2014 M/s. Guru Harikishan Public School vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi.

Present: None for the appellant.

Sh. M. Aamir Faiyaz, proxy counsel for the Respondent.

Order dated- 23.09.2025 Proxy counsel for the respondent has produced the Email ID of the appellant (ghps_79@redifmail.com) which is maintained in the records of the respondent department. As none has appeared on behalf of the appellant, put up the case on 12.11.2025 for final arguments. Office is directed to give a notice to the appellant through email.

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 1 DELHI

Item no.- 10

65(4)2015 M/s Boby Creation vs. APFC/RPFC Delhi.

Present: None for the appellant. Sh. A.S. Negi, AR for the respondent.

,

Order dated-23.09.2025

Despite being served a notice through mail as well as by post none appeared on behalf of the appellant. However, AR for the respondent is present and submits that his counsel Sh. Abhishek Sharma is not available and he had also sent the mail to the official mail of this Tribunal, expressing his unavailability to appear.

Record perused. In the present matter, rejoinder has also been filed, even the written argument has been found on record. From the facts of the case as well as written argument, it has been appeared that the order has been passed in respect of the amount assessed under section 7-A of Rs. 37,163/- on the basis of some entry in the cash book. Case file under section 7-A in regard to the present inquiry be summoned. Put up for 14.10.2025. A copy of this order be sent to the RPFC. In the meanwhile, a fresh notice be issued through mail to the appellant provided by the respondent.

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 1 DELHI

Item no.- 11

D-1/25/2019 M/s United News of India vs. APFC/RPFC Delhi (Central).

Present: Sh. Chetan Singh, Proxy counsel for the appellant. Sh. B.B Pradhan, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.

,

Order dated-23.09.2025

Counsel of the respondent has moved an application for disposal of the appeal in view of the order passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in WPC no. 4902/2019 and 9108/2020, where I.R.P appointed in the present cases has deposited the entire amount involve in this appeal as well other appeals which is pending. Copy of the application along with order of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi is supplied to the appellant’s proxy counsel. Let this appeal as well as other appeal pending i.e. D-1/20/2021 be taken on 10.10.2025. Previous date of other appeal bearing no. D-1/20/2021 listed on 21.01.2026 is preponed for 10.10.2025. A copy of this order be also placed in another appeal.

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 1 DELHI

Item no.- 12

D-1/71/2019 M/s Alkarma Industries vs. APFC/RPFC-II, Delhi (North).

Present: Sh. S.K. Khanna, Proxy counsel for Sh. Rajiv Arora, Ld. Counsel

for the appellant. Sh. Manu Parashkar & Sh. Manu Prabhakar, Ld. Counsels for the respondent.

,

Order dated-23.09.2025

Proxy counsel for the appellant seeks adjournment stating that main counsel is not well today. At request, this case is adjourned to 13.11.2025 for final argument.

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 1 DELHI

Item no.- 14

D-1/09/2023 M/s Institution for the Blind vs. APFC/RPFC Delhi (Central).

Present: Sh. S.K Khanna, Ld. Counsel for the appellant. Sh. B.B Pradhan, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.

,

Order dated-23.09.2025

At request of the counsel of the respondent, this case is adjourned to 17.102.2025 for final argument.