Allahabad High Court
NABAIL/10169/2026 of SAMEENA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10169 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the records. 2. The present application has been filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482
BNSS No. - 10169 of 2026
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the records.
2. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.0305 of 2026, under Sections 105, 318(4), 319(1) B.N.S., 2023 & Section 34 of National Medical Commission Act-2019, Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Saharanpur, with a prayer to grant her anticipatory bail.
3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this application and move an appropriate application seeking regular bail before the concerned Court. He prays that a direction may be given to the concerned court to decide the bail application expeditiously.
4. Learned AGA has no objection to the said prayer.
5. On the prayer made, it is provided that in case the applicant appears before the concerned court and applies for bail within fifteen days from today, her application for bail shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law.
6. However, For a period of fifteen days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant herein in pursuance of aforesaid case.
7. With these observations, the application is disposed of. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prashant Rai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sameena .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
8. It is made clear that no further time shall be granted to comply with this order.
(Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) October 8, 2026 Radhika NABAIL No. 10169 of 2026 2
Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad