Allahabad High Court
CRLP/23644/2026 of MAKDOOM ALI Vs THE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23644 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following main reliefs:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23644 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following main reliefs:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent nos.2 & 3 to arrest the accused and sent jail who are named in the FIR in pursuance of the impugned FIR dated 23.07.2026 in Case Crime No. 0200 of 2026, under Sections 61 (2), 85, 80 (2) of BNS and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Pakbara, District Moradabad. (Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition).
II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus to the respondent no.2 & 3 to decide the representation dated 14.09.2026 given by the petitioner."
2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State submitted that after completion of investigation charge-sheet has already been forwarded on 14.09.2026 to the Court concerned.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted and prayed that in the light of the statement given by learned AGA for the State the instant writ petition may be disposed of.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material available on record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aysha Begum, Binod Kumar Vishwakarma, Kamala Shanker Singh, Yug Raj Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Makdoom Ali .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State that the charge-sheet has already been forwarded as well as prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner, we do not find any reason to keep this matter pending for further adjudication.
6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed.
October 8, 2026 C. MANI CRLP No. 23644 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad