Allahabad High Court
NABAIL/10186/2026 of NAJAR MOHAMMAD Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10186 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard Sri Hari Bans Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Mohd. Nuruddin, holding brief of Sri Ajay Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
- 10186 of 2026
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Hari Bans Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Mohd. Nuruddin, holding brief of Sri Ajay Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for opposite party no.2/ informant, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the records.
2. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.61 of 2026, under Sections 191(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 110 & 117(2) of B.N.S., Police Station Chauri, District Bhadohi, with a prayer to grant him anticipatory bail.
3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this application and move an appropriate application seeking regular bail before the concerned Court. He prays that a direction may be given to the concerned court to decide the bail application expeditiously.
4. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant have no objection to the said prayer.
5. On the prayer made, it is provided that in case the applicant appears before the concerned court and applies for bail within four weeks from today, his application for bail shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Hari Bans Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ajay Kumar Srivastava, G.A., Syed Shahnawaz Shah Najar Mohammad .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
SCC OnLine SC 825).
6. However, for a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant herein in pursuance of aforesaid case.
7. With these observations, the application is disposed of.
8. It is made clear that no further time shall be granted to comply with this order. October 8, 2026 Radhika NABAIL No. 10186 of 2026 2 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad