Allahabad High Court
WRIC/41000/2026 of SMT. KHUSHI AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 41000 of 2026 Court No. - 73 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of petitioners is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. By means of the present
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 41000 of 2026
Court No. - 73
HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of petitioners is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
3. By means of the present petition, the petitioners are seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in the peaceful married life of the petitioners as husband and wife and further direction has also been sought for the authorities concerned to provide protection to the petitioners.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have solemnized marriage out of their own free will and consent without any coercion, since they are major and are living together as married couple. Further, it is stated that private respondent and other family members have got annoyed and there is serious danger to their lives as they are being threatened and harassed and in this regard they have moved an application dated 19.09.2026 before the Commissioner of Police, Commissionarate Prayagraj.
5. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel submits that as per his instructions petitioner No. 1 is Permanent R/o village Bhelkha, Police Station Sarai Mamrej, District Prayagraj and temporary resident of Ekta Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Parvesh Kumar Pandey, Sarvesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Khushi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
Rahivasi Chal Kolshen Road, Police Station ke samne, Thane, Maharashtra., which address is also mentioned in the array of parties. As per his instruction both the petitioner are living in Mumbai, Maharastra whereas they are seeking direction to the Commissioner of Police, Commissionarate Prayagraj for protection, thus this prayer is not genuine.
6. Considering the above submissions, this Court is of the view that the prayer made by the petitioners regarding protection is not liable to be accepted. The writ petition is misconceived and is liable to be dismissed.
7. Dismissed accordingly. October 8, 2026 S.Mishra WRIC No. 41000 of 2026 2 (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad