Allahabad High Court

NA528/32231/2026 of RITESH KUMAR SHAKYA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 32231 of 2026 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Sri Sharad Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Mayank Singh, learned counsel for the informant and Sri Chhavi Pal Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State are

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 32231 of 2026 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Sri Sharad Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Mayank Singh, learned counsel for the informant and Sri Chhavi Pal Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State are present. The present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No.362 of 2023, arising out of Case Crime No.130 of 2023, under Sections 376 IPC, 3/4 POCSO Act and 67a of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act-2008, Police Station- Ankur Vihar, District- Ghaziabad, pending in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (POCSO Act), Court No.1, Ghaziabad. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for the informant pointed out that six prosecution witnesses have been examined before the trial court. The learned AGA further pointed out that the trial is at an advance stage. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press this application and wants liberty to file an appropriate application/ proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. Certified copy of the order may be returned to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining a xerox thereof. In view of the above, the application is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. October 8, 2026 LN Tripathi Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rohit Kushwaha, Sharad Chandra Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Mayank Singh, G.A. (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Ritesh Kumar Shakya .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- LALIT TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead