Allahabad High Court

A227/702/2017 of SUKH LAL AND 8 OTHERS Vs SHAMBHU DAYAL AND 5 OTHERS on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 702 of 2017 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Counsel for petitioners states that he has no instructions in the matter. 2. In view of said fact, the writ petition is dismissed for want of instructions. October 8, 2026 (V. S.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 702 of 2017

Court No. - 9

HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Counsel for petitioners states that he has no instructions in the matter.

2. In view of said fact, the writ petition is dismissed for want of instructions. October 8, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) :

(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Sukh Lal And 8 Others .....Petitioner(s) Shambhu Dayal And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead