Allahabad High Court
NA528/43727/2026 of RUMANA @ SONALI AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 43727 of 2026 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Sri Pawan Singh Pundir, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Chavi Pal Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State are present. The present application under Section 528 of the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 43727 of 2026 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Sri Pawan Singh Pundir, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Chavi Pal Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State are present. The present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 1145/9 of 2021, arising out of Case Crime No. 67 of 2021, under Sections 363, 366 and 376 of I.P.C. and 3/4 of the POCSO Act 2012, Police Station- Budhana, District- Muzaffar Nagar, as well as cognizance/ summoning order dated 02.08.2021 pending in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge/ Special Judge (POCSO Act) Muzaffar Nagar. Learned A.G.A. pointed out that the aforesaid case is listed for argument and the applicant no. 1 is victim and applicant no. 2 is accused in the present case. The present application has been filed by the victim as well as accused.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press this application and wants liberty to file an appropriate application/ proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. Certified copy of the order may be returned to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining a xerox thereof. In view of the above, the application is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. October 8, 2026 Ishan Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pawan Singh Pundir Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Rumana @ Sonali And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad