Allahabad High Court

NA528/43727/2026 of RUMANA @ SONALI AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 43727 of 2026 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Sri Pawan Singh Pundir, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Chavi Pal Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State are present. The present application under Section 528 of the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 43727 of 2026 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Sri Pawan Singh Pundir, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Chavi Pal Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State are present. The present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 1145/9 of 2021, arising out of Case Crime No. 67 of 2021, under Sections 363, 366 and 376 of I.P.C. and 3/4 of the POCSO Act 2012, Police Station- Budhana, District- Muzaffar Nagar, as well as cognizance/ summoning order dated 02.08.2021 pending in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge/ Special Judge (POCSO Act) Muzaffar Nagar. Learned A.G.A. pointed out that the aforesaid case is listed for argument and the applicant no. 1 is victim and applicant no. 2 is accused in the present case. The present application has been filed by the victim as well as accused.

After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press this application and wants liberty to file an appropriate application/ proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. Certified copy of the order may be returned to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining a xerox thereof. In view of the above, the application is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. October 8, 2026 Ishan Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pawan Singh Pundir Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Rumana @ Sonali And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead