Allahabad High Court
NA528/35949/2026 of MOHAMMAD ZAMEER KHAN AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 35949 of 2026 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE NAND PRABHA SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Mr. Vipin Kumar, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 35949 of 2026
Court No. - 77
HON'BLE NAND PRABHA SHUKLA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Vipin Kumar, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. The present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been preferred to allow the application and quash the entire criminal proceeding of Case No. 1033 of 2025 (State Versus Nazreen and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 92 of 2025, under Sections 115(2) and 352 of B.N.S., Police Station-Delhi Gate, District-Aligarh initiated before learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 8, Aligarh in pursuance of summoning order dated 10.10.2025 and to stay further proceeding of the aforesaid Case.
3. From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case, at this stage, it cannot be said that prima facie no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 528 B.N.S.S. Only in cases where the Court finds that there has been failure of justice or misuse of judicial mechanism or procedure, sentence or order was not correct, this power may be exercised to prevent the abuse of process of miscarriage of justice. Therefore, no interference is required.
4. Accordingly, prayer of the applicants is refused.
5. However, considering the prayer made by learned counsel for the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satyawati, Vipin Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohammad Zameer Khan And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
applicants, it is directed that in case the applicants apply for bail before the concerned court within 30 days from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously in the light of law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in (2021) 10 SCC 773.
6. For a period of 30 days from today or till the time of applying the bail application before the court concerned, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in Case No. 1033 of 2025 (State Versus Nazreen and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 92 of 2025, under Sections 115(2) and 352 of B.N.S., Police Station-Delhi Gate, District-Aligarh.
7. With the above observations, this application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. is disposed of. October 8, 2026 Shivani Sri. NA528 No. 35949 of 2026 2 (Nand Prabha Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVANI SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad