Allahabad High Court
BAIL/28198/2026 of SAJID @ BHUTANI Vs STATE OF U.P. on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28198 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. Second supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Sachin Malik, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ram Mohit Yadav, learned
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28198 of 2026
Court No. - 68
HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. List has been revised. Second supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Sachin Malik, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ram Mohit Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.
3. By means of the present bail application, the applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.78 of 2026, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Shahpur, District- Muzaffarnagar, during the pendency of trial.
4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the prosecution under the Gangsters Act have been launched against the applicant on the basis of one criminal case shown in the gang chart in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. The detail of criminal case has been mentioned in the affidavit accompanying the bail application. He has been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. He is not the member of any gang. The criminal history of fourteen cases assigned to the applicant stands explained. The applicant is languishing in jail since 01.04.2026. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
5. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Onkar Singh, Sachin Malik Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Sajid @ Bhutani .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant- Sajid @ Bhutani, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required.
7. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. October 8, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 28198 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad