Allahabad High Court

BAIL/34962/2026 of ANURAG Vs STATE OF U.P. on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34962 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Vaibhav Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Deepak Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34962 of 2026

Court No. - 68

HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. List has been revised.

2. Heard Sri Vaibhav Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Deepak Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.385 of 2026, under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 337, 338, 339, 340(2), 341(2), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) & Section 66D of Information Technology Act, 2008, Police Station- Kalyanpur, District- Kanpur Nagar, during the pendency of trial.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by learned counsels for the parties, and taking into consideration that similarly placed co- accused, Tejas Pal @ Tejas Garariya, has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 10.9.2026 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.32066 of 2026, coupled with the fact that applicant has no criminal history, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed on the ground of parity.

5. Let the applicant- Anurag, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required.

6. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. (Krishan Pahal,J.) October 8, 2026 Vikas Verma Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Phool Singh Yadav, Vaibhav Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Anurag .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead