Allahabad High Court
BAIL/35004/2026 of RAHUL Vs STATE OF U.P. on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35004 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Ardhendu Shekhar Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri R.P. Singh, learned State Law Officer and perused the material placed on
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35004 of 2026
Court No. - 68
HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. List has been revised.
2. Heard Sri Ardhendu Shekhar Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri R.P. Singh, learned State Law Officer and perused the material placed on record.
3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.83 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 352, 115(2), 109(1), 126(2), 3(5) BNS, Police Station Baleni, District Baghpat, during the pendency of trial.
4. The criminal history assigned to the applicant has been explained.
5. This Court is of the view that if a case for bail is otherwise made out, an accused cannot be kept incarcerated solely on account of his criminal antecedents. In the instant case, the criminal history assigned to the applicant has been properly explained.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration that similarly placed co-accused person Amit @ Abali has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 23.9.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.28716 of 2026 , and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed on the ground of parity. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ardhendu Shekhar Sharma, Ram Babu Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rahul .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
7. Let the applicant- Rahul be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required.
8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. October 8, 2026 Shalini BAIL No. 35004 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad