Allahabad High Court

WRIB/3258/2026 of TARAWATI AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3258 of 2026 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed notice upon the private respondents is

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3258 of 2026 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed notice upon the private respondents is hereby dispensed with. The limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is for issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the concerned respondent to correct the wrong entries in CH Form 23 and Khatauni 1429-1434 F of Khata No. 68 & 70, Gata No. 62 & 65, and Khata No. 63 Gata No. 157, Village Damkhudiya, Pargana Richa, Tehsil-Baheri, District Bareilly as well as for a direction to the respondent no. 3 to decide the objection under Section 9-A (2) of UPCH Act, filed by the petitioner no. 2, pending before him, within the time frame fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that application is pending consideration since long and the purpose of filing the present petition would stand served if appropriate directions are issued to the respondent No. 3 to consider and decide the aforesaid case. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid proposition. Considering the totality of the circumstances and submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would stand sub served if directions are issued for expeditious Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Archana Singh, Prem Shankar Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Tarawati And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

disposal of the case. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off with a direction to the concerned respondent to correct the wrong entries in CH Form 23 and Khatauni 1429-1434 F of Khata No. 68 & 70, Gata No. 62 & 65, and Khata No. 63 Gata No. 157, Village Damkhudiya, Pargana Richa, Tehsil- Baheri, District Bareilly as well as for a direction to the respondent no. 3 to decide the objection under Section 9-A (2) of UPCH Act, filed by the petitioner no. 2, pending before him on merits, strictly in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all parties concerned expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of service of certified copy of the order of this Court. October 8, 2026 Deepak/ WRIB No. 3258 of 2026 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead