Allahabad High Court
WRIB/3258/2026 of TARAWATI AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3258 of 2026 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed notice upon the private respondents is
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3258 of 2026 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed notice upon the private respondents is hereby dispensed with. The limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is for issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the concerned respondent to correct the wrong entries in CH Form 23 and Khatauni 1429-1434 F of Khata No. 68 & 70, Gata No. 62 & 65, and Khata No. 63 Gata No. 157, Village Damkhudiya, Pargana Richa, Tehsil-Baheri, District Bareilly as well as for a direction to the respondent no. 3 to decide the objection under Section 9-A (2) of UPCH Act, filed by the petitioner no. 2, pending before him, within the time frame fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that application is pending consideration since long and the purpose of filing the present petition would stand served if appropriate directions are issued to the respondent No. 3 to consider and decide the aforesaid case. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid proposition. Considering the totality of the circumstances and submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would stand sub served if directions are issued for expeditious Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Archana Singh, Prem Shankar Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Tarawati And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
disposal of the case. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off with a direction to the concerned respondent to correct the wrong entries in CH Form 23 and Khatauni 1429-1434 F of Khata No. 68 & 70, Gata No. 62 & 65, and Khata No. 63 Gata No. 157, Village Damkhudiya, Pargana Richa, Tehsil- Baheri, District Bareilly as well as for a direction to the respondent no. 3 to decide the objection under Section 9-A (2) of UPCH Act, filed by the petitioner no. 2, pending before him on merits, strictly in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all parties concerned expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of service of certified copy of the order of this Court. October 8, 2026 Deepak/ WRIB No. 3258 of 2026 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad