Allahabad High Court
BAIL/36085/2026 of RAJNESH Vs STATE OF U.P. on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36085 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri R.P. Singh, learned State Law Officer and perused the material placed on record.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36085 of 2026
Court No. - 68
HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. List has been revised.
2. Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri R.P. Singh, learned State Law Officer and perused the material placed on record.
3. By means of the present bail application, the applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 54 of 2026, under Section 2/3(1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station-Achhalda, District- Auraiya, during the pendency of trial.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated under the Gangsters Act based on a gang chart citing two criminal cases, in all of which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. There is a criminal history of six cases assigned to the applicant, which stands explained. He has been languishing in jail since 9.10.2025 and assures that, if granted, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and shall fully co-operate with the trial.
5. The bail application has been opposed by learned A.G.A.
6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant- Rajnesh, involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the condition that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required.
7. The breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. (Krishan Pahal,J.) October 8, 2026 Shalini Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sunil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Rajnesh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad