Allahabad High Court
WRIC/29559/2026 of AMEENA KHATOON AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29559 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Sri P.C. Yadav, learned counsel, holding the brief of Sri Roop Shandilya, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Awadhesh Kumar Patel, learned standing counsel for the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 29559 of 2026
Court No. - 37
HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri P.C. Yadav, learned counsel, holding the brief of Sri Roop Shandilya, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Awadhesh Kumar Patel, learned standing counsel for the state-respondents.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction issued in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent no.2/Tehsildar, Padrona, Kushinagar to decide the pending proceeding of mutation case bearing Case No.460 of 2026 (Computerized No.T202605440100460) (Ameena Khatoon and Another vs. Ali Hussain), under Section 34/35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, pending since 6.1.2026, within the stipulated period."
3. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that proceeding under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending before respondent no.2/Tehsildar since 6.1.2026. He placed the case summary annexed along with the writ petition in order to demonstrate that the case is not proceeding expeditiously.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid proceedings to its logical conclusion, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 3 months, from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before the authority concerned, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, in accordance with law. October 8, 2026 C.Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Roop Shandilya, Vinay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Ameena Khatoon And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad