Allahabad High Court
BAIL/35998/2026 of SAVEJ Vs STATE OF U.P. on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35998 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Ms. Divyangi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Pankaj Bharti, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Arun Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35998 of 2026
Court No. - 68
HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. List has been revised.
2. Heard Ms. Divyangi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Pankaj Bharti, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Arun Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.
3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.126 of 2026, under Sections 3/5/8 of U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 at Police Station- Jansath, District Muzaffarnagar with a prayer to enlarge him on bail.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is not named in the FIR. His name has simply been added by the police on the information received from an squealer, which has not evidentiary value in the eyes of law. There is no previous criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 11.09.2026 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
5. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the fact that the applicant is not named in the FIR, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pankaj Bharti Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Savej .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
is allowed.
7. Let the applicant- Savej, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required.
8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. October 8, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 35998 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad