Allahabad High Court
NA528/30231/2026 of VISHVNATH BATHLA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 30231 of 2026 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Sri Sushil Shukla, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Sunil Vashisth, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Avnish Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the private opposite
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 30231 of 2026 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Sri Sushil Shukla, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Sunil Vashisth, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Avnish Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the private opposite party No.2 and Ms.Saumya Madhyan, learned brief-holder for the State are present. The present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed to quash to quash the order dated 1.9.2022 passed by Sessions Judge, Meerut in anticipatory bail application No.725 of 2024 arising out of Case Crime No.347 of 2019 under Section 420, 402, 504, 506, 120B IPC IPC, P.S.-Lal Kurti, District-Meerut, whereby condition No.6 has been imposed. Learned Senior Counsel for the applicant submits that the impugned condition No.6 has been imposed without considering the facts and circumstances of the position of law. It is further submitted that by condition No.6, the application /accused is directed to give an undertaking as he has not sell out immoveable property. It is further submitted that in a case of a criminal case, the interim injunction has been granted by the concerned court in anticipatory bail application. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for private opposite party No.2 has not denied the factual position of the case. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the condition imposed by the court concerned is highly objectionable and after laid down the repeated law Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nidhi, Sunil Vashisth, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Avnish Kumar Srivastava, G.A. Vishvnath Bathla .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
in this regard, present application is allowed and the condition No.6 is quashed as imposed in order dated dated 1.9.2022, passed by Sessions Judge, Meerut. October 8, 2026 LN Tripathi NA528 No. 30231 of 2026 2 (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Digitally signed by :- LALIT TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad