Allahabad High Court
NABAIL/9704/2026 of AMAR KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9704 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri Devaang Savla, learned Advocate holding brief of Shri Anuj Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Rupak Chaubey, learned
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Shri Devaang Savla, learned Advocate holding brief of Shri Anuj Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Rupak Chaubey, learned AGA for the State of UP and perused the records.
2. Present anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime/FIR No.312 of 2026, under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 3(5) BNS, 2023, Sections 3, 12(1) & 21 of the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025, Police Station Phase-II, NOIDA, District Gautam Budh Nagar, with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail.
3. Based on the instructions received from the Investigating Officer of Police Station Phase-II, NOIDA, District Gautam Budh Nagar, learned AGA states that the applicant is not wanted in the present case and he is not being arrested by the local police, therefore, the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant is not maintainable.
4. On being confronted with this, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present application be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh anticipatory bail application, at the appropriate stage.
5. With the aforesaid liberty, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn.
6. It is made clear that in case the police finds involvement of the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anuj Srivastava, Juveriya Kazmi, Naman Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amar Kumar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
applicant in the present case, the applicant will be informed by the police in writing so that he may revive his anticipatory bail application.
7. Needless to say that the applicant will co-operate with the investigation and he shall appear as and when required by the investigating officer.
8. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 8, 2026 Nitendra NABAIL No. 9704 of 2026
(Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITENDRA TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad