Allahabad High Court
NA528/40263/2026 of VANSHRAJI AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 40263 of 2026 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants; learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant application u/s 528 BNSS has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 40263 of 2026
Court No. - 72
HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants; learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant application u/s 528 BNSS has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to quash the impugned summoning order dated 12.11.2025 passed by learned court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate II, Jaunpur in Complaint Case No.481 of 2022 (Lalita Devi vs. Vanshraji and others), under Sections 420 and 506 IPC, Police Station Sikrara, District Jaunpur.
3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. From perusal of contents of complaint, no offence under alleged sections is made out against applicant.
4. Per contra, learned AGA opposed the submission of applicant's counsel and submitted that prima facie, offence under the alleged sections is made out against the applicants. He further submitted that submission raised by applicant's counsel are disputed question of facts, which cannot be entertained at this stage.
5. The prayer for quashing the entire proceedings and summoning order of the aforesaid case against the applicants is, hereby, refused.
6. However, if the applicants move discharge application before the concerned court within three weeks from today, the concerned court shall Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Kumar Shukla, Kuldeep Narayan Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vanshraji And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
decide the same in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of filing of discharge application. Till disposal of discharge application, no coercive action will be taken against the applicants.
7. With the above directions, this application u/s 528 B.N.S.S. is disposed of. October 8, 2026 Meenu Singh NA528 No. 40263 of 2026 2 (Deepak Verma,J.) Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad