Allahabad High Court
BAIL/35990/2026 of PARVEJ AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35990 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Ms. Divyangi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Pankaj Bharti, learned counsel for the applicants, Ms. Ifrah Islam, learned State Law Officer for
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35990 of 2026
Court No. - 68
HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. List has been revised.
2. Heard Ms. Divyangi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Pankaj Bharti, learned counsel for the applicants, Ms. Ifrah Islam, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record.
3. Applicants seek bail in Case Crime No.126 of 2026, under Sections 3/5/8 of U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 at Police Station- Jansath, District Muzaffarnagar, with a prayer to enlarge them on bail.
4. Learned counsel for the applicants has argued that the applicants are not named in the FIR. Their names have simply been added by the police on the information received from an squealer, which has not evidentiary value in the eyes of law. There is no previous criminal history of the applicants. The applicants are languishing in jail since 11.09.2026 and they are ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicants are released on bail, they will not misuse the liberty of bail.
5. Learned State Law Officer has vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the fact that the applicants are not named in the FIR, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie, the Court is of the view that the applicants have made out a case for bail. The Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pankaj Bharti Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Parvej And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
bail application is allowed.
7. Let the applicants- Parvej and Sanawwar, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that they shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required.
8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. October 8, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 35990 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad