Allahabad High Court

BAIL/28715/2026 of ROHIT SARJAN Vs STATE OF U.P. on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28715 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. Rejoinder affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Kumar Anish, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Yogesh Mishra, learned State Law

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28715 of 2026

Court No. - 68

HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. List has been revised. Rejoinder affidavit filed today is taken on record.

2. Heard Sri Kumar Anish, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Yogesh Mishra, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record.

3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.16 of 2026, under Section 318(4) of B.N.S. and 43, 66, 66C, and 66D of 1.T. Act, Police Station Cyber Crime, District- Bulandshahr, during the pendency of trial.

4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that similarly placed co-accused person Karan Giri has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 01.07.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.19020 of 2026, and that there is no criminal history of the applicant, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed on the ground of parity.

5. Let the applicant- Rohit Sarjan, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required.

6. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. (Krishan Pahal,J.) October 8, 2026 (Ravi Kant) Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kumar Anish Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Rohit Sarjan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead