Allahabad High Court
WRIA/16611/2026 of MANOJ KUMAR BHARDWAJ AND 34 OTHERS Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 7 OTHERS on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16611 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: " a ) issue, a writ order or direction, in the nature of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 16611 of 2026
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "a) issue, a writ order or direction, in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondent Authorities, to consider the grievance of the Petitioner s with regard to their transfer, from Railway Protection Special Force (RPSF) to Railway Protection Force (RPF), in Pursuance of the Clause 8(ii) of the Directive 60 dated 29/03/2023, and Directive 58 dated 18/03/2024, as the Petitioner has already completed more than 08 years of their services in the Railway Protection Special Force (RPSF).
b) issue, a writ order or direction, in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondent Authorities, to transfer the Petitioners from Railway Protection Special Force (RPSF) to Railway Protection Force (RPF), in Pursuance of the Clause 8(ii) of the Directive 60 dated 29/03/2023, and Directive 58 dated 18/03/2024, as the Petitioners have already completed more than 08 years of their services in the Railway Protection Special Force (RPSF)."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are working as Railway Protection Special Force and they are seeking transfer to Railway Protection Force in Pursuance of the Clause 8(ii) of the Directive 60 dated 29/03/2023, and Directive 58 dated 18/03/2024, as the Petitioners have already completed more than 08 years of their services in the Railway Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arya Gautam, Atipriya Gautam, Sr. Advocate, Vaishnavi Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. Manoj Kumar Bhardwaj And 34 Others .....Petitioner(s) The Union Of India And 7 Others .....Respondent(s)
Protection Special Force (RPSF). It has also been submitted that the petitioners have already moved application/representation in this regard.
4. Learned Counsel for Respondents has submitted that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Looking into the facts of the case, it is provided that in case, the petitioners move fresh representation before the competent authority, the same shall be decided, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of filing of representations after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.
6. With the aforesaid observation, the petition is disposed of. October 8, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIA No. 16611 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad