CRLP/12048/2025 of SMT. KUSUM AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 7 October 2026

1. Case called out in revised list. Even though, the names of Mr. Subhash Kehari and Mr. Imaran Ahmad are duly published in the cause list as counsel for petitioners but neither they nor anyone on their behalf is present to press this writ petition even in revised call.

2. Learned AGA representing State/respondents 1 to 3 is present.

3. On the matter being taken up, the learned AGA representing State/respondents 1, 2 and 3 submits that during pendency of present writ petition, Investigating Officer, upon completion of statutory investigation of concerned case crime number has submitted the police report/final report in terms of Section 193(3) BNSS. As such, no cause of action now survives to petitioner to maintain the present writ petition. He, therefore, submits that present writ petition is liable to be dismissed as having rendered infructuous.

4. Having heard the learned A.G.A. representing State/respondents 1, 2 and 3, considering the objections raised by the learned A.G.A. in opposition to present writ petition as noted herein above, and upon perusal of record, we find that in view of the objections raised by the learned A.G.A., no cause of action now survives with petitioner to maintain the present writ petition.

5. As a result, present writ petition fails and is liable to be dismissed as having rendered infructuous

6. It is accordingly dismissed as having rendered infructuous.

7. Interim order, if any, granted earlier shall stand vacated. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Imaran Ahmad, Subhash Kehari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Smt. Kusum And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

October 8, 2026 YK CRLP No. 12048 of 2025 2 (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Digitally signed by :- YASHWANT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad