Allahabad High Court

WRIA/16596/2026 of AMARJEET RAWAT Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16596 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents no.1 to 4; Shri U.B.Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.5, and

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - A No. - 16596 of 2026

Court No. - 32

HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents no.1 to 4; Shri U.B.Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.5, and perused the record on board.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the notice dated 18.08.2026, whereby he has been required to deposit a sum of Rs. 8,16,799.19 towards the alleged financial loss caused to the Corporation.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already submitted a reply/representation dated 25.08.2026 (Annexure-3), against the aforesaid notice. It is further submitted that the Additional District Cooperative Officer, Tehsil Sadar, district Jaunpur (respondent no.4) may be directed to consider and decide the said representation within such stipulated period, as may be directed by this Court.

4. Having considered the innocuous prayer advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, this court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the instant matter pending. Accordingly, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case as raised in the present writ petition, with a direction to respondent no. 4 to consider and decide the petitioner's reply/representation dated 25.08.2026 (Annexure-3) sympathetically, in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of one month from the date of production of a certified copy of this Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Upadhyay, Rinkee Rawat, Sujeet Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Udai Bhanu Singh Amarjeet Rawat .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)

order, provided there is no other legal impediment.

5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, present writ petition is disposed of. October 8, 2026 VR WRIA No. 16596 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA RATAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead