Allahabad High Court
WRIA/16618/2026 of RAMESH RAM Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16618 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "Issue a writ,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 16618 of 2026
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature petitioner's pension of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to sanction and release the petitioner's pension with effect from 01.01.2025 And pay the entire arrears of pension from 01.01.2025 till the date of actual commencement of pension alongwith all other admissible retiral dues including Gratuity, Commuted value of pension, G.P.F. and leave encashment etc. within a period of 4 weeks or such other period as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is seeking pension from 01.01.2025 as well as entire arrears from 01.01.2025 till the date of actual commencement of pension and all other admissible retiral dues including Gratuity, Commuted value of pension, G.P.F. and leave encashment etc. In this regard, the petitioner has moved a representation/application which is pending consideration.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate to direct the respondent authority to decide the representation/application of the petitioner within a time frame as fixed by this Court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Chaubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ramesh Ram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent authority to consider and decide the aforementioned representation/application of the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned provided that there is no other legal impediment.
October 8, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIA No. 16618 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad