Allahabad High Court
WRIC/29543/2026 of ABDULLAH KHAN Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29543 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Sri Vinod Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Awadhesh Kumar Patel, learned standing counsel for the state-respondents and Sri Krishna Pal Verma, learned counsel for the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 29543 of 2026
Court No. - 37
HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Vinod Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Awadhesh Kumar Patel, learned standing counsel for the state-respondents and Sri Krishna Pal Verma, learned counsel for the respondent-Nagar Palika Parishad.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the court below/respondent no.2/Up Ziladhikari, Tehsil Bhadohi, District Bhadohi to decide the restoration application moved by the petitioner dated 7.5.2025, under Section 209(h) of the U.P. Revenue Code, being Case No.03565 of
(Computerized Case No.T201816670503565) (Naseem Khan vs. State), within the stipulated period."
3. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that restoration application filed on behalf of the petitioner along with prayer for condonation of delay is pending before respondent no.2 since 7.5.2025, as such, appropriate direction be issued to the respondent concerned for the expeditious disposal of the pending restoration proceeding.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, coupled with the fact that restoration application dated 7.5.2025 has been filed against the order dated 30.3.1990 passed in the proceeding under Section 229-B of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, no case for expeditious disposal of the pending restoration proceeding is made out.
5. The writ petition is dismissed. October 8, 2026 C.Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Pal Verma, Vinod Kr Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Abdullah Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad