Allahabad High Court

CRLP/21661/2026 of MANGLAWATI DEVI Vs STATE OF UP AND 7 OTHERS on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21661 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following main reliefs:- "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21661 of 2026

Court No. - 48

HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following main reliefs:- "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing respondent nos.3 and 4 to ensure fair, impartial and speedy investigation in Crime No.69 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 117(2) of B.N.S., Police Station Kalwari, District-Basti.

ii) Issue a writ, order or direction commanding respondent no.3 to arrest the accused persons at the earliest and take appropriate legal action as per law."

2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State submitted that after completion of investigation charge-sheet has already been forwarded on 27.04.2026 to the Court concerned.

3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submitted and prayed that in the light of the statement given by learned AGA for the State the instant writ petition may be disposed of.

4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Mr. S.N. Tiwari, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material available on record.

5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State that the charge sheet has Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bashisth Narain Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Manglawati Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 7 Others .....Respondent(s)

already been forwarded as well as prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner, we do not find any reason to keep this matter pending for further adjudication.

6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed. October 8, 2026 Atul CRLP No. 21661 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead