Allahabad High Court

BAIL/36039/2026 of PRATAP SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36039 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Ms. Ifrah Islam, learned State Law Officer and perused the material placed on

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36039 of 2026

Court No. - 68

HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. List has been revised.

2. Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Ms. Ifrah Islam, learned State Law Officer and perused the material placed on record.

3. By means of the present bail application, the applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 526 of 2026, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Lohiya Nagar, District-Meerut, during the pendency of trial.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated under the Gangsters Act based on a gang chart citing two criminal cases, in all of which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. There is no criminal history assigned to the applicant. He has been languishing in jail since 11.9.2026 and assures that, if granted, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and shall fully co-operate with the trial.

5. The bail application has been opposed by learned State Law Officer.

6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant- Pratap Singh, involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the condition that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required.

7. The breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. (Krishan Pahal,J.) October 8, 2026 Shalini Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Pratap Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead