BAIL/34791/2026 of FARMAN Vs STATE OF U.P. on 7 October 2026

1. List has been revised.

2. Heard Sri Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anit Kumar Shukla, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.337 of 2026, under section 8/21/29 N.D.P.S. Act, Police Station Gangoh, District Saharanpur, during the pendency of trial.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by learned counsels for the parties, particularly the fact that no recovery has been made from the applicant and he has been implicated in the case merely on the basis of confessional statement of arrested accused person Mukarim recorded U/s 67 of NDPS Act, which has no evidentiary value in the eyes of law, coupled with the fact that criminal history assigned to the applicant stands explained, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is, prima facie, of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

5. Let the applicant- Farman, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required.

6. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. (Krishan Pahal,J.) October 8, 2026 Vikas Verma Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Kumar, Anup Rai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Farman .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad