Allahabad High Court
A227/8682/2017 of MAHENDRA KUMAR MISHRA AND 2 OTHERS Vs SMT. ARTI PREMANI AND 3 OTHERS on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8682 of 2017 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Counsel for respondents states that as per her instructions the suit itself has been decided in the year 2021 and writ petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of statement
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8682 of 2017
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Counsel for respondents states that as per her instructions the suit itself has been decided in the year 2021 and writ petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of statement so made, the writ petition is dismissed.
3. However, in case, the suit is still pending, petitioner may move a recall application. October 8, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Narendra Bhushan Nigam, Ram Naresh Nigam Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rama Goel Bansal (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Mahendra Kumar Mishra And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Arti Premani And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad