Allahabad High Court
WRIA/7805/2026 of KM. VANDANA DEVI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 7805 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This petition has been filed for the following relief: (i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the liable respondent authority to call the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 7805 of 2026
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This petition has been filed for the following relief:
(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the liable respondent authority to call the petitioner for counseling on the post of Anganwadi Sevika of the village Jopa, post district Mirzapur for appointment.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the liable respondent authority to decide the representation as subject claim of the petitioner.
2. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that for the post of Anganwadi Sevika, the persons at serial Nos. 1 and 2 were not eligible to be appointed and therefore petitioner be appointed.
3. Learned Standing Counsel has produced the instructions and on the basis of instructions he has submitted that on a complaint made by the petitioner it has been found that the candidature of persons at serial nos. 1 and 2 were not correct and, therefore, their candidature has been cancelled and it has been decided not to fill up the post by the State.
4. Merely because petitioner is at serial no. 3, he has no right to compel the respondents to appoint him. Once the decision has been taken by the respondents not to appoint anybody on the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Bans Singh, Krishna Kant Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Km. Vandana Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
said post and the post is to be kept vacant, there is no illegality in the action of the respondents, therefore no relief can be granted to the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. October 8, 2026 Kumar Manish WRIA No. 7805 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANISH TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad