Allahabad High Court

A227/729/2012 of RAJENDRA KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs SMT. GEETA DEVI AND OTHERS on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 729 of 2012 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Sri G.D. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners states that present writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time and the same may be dismissed. 2. In view of the

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 729 of 2012

Court No. - 9

HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Sri G.D. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners states that present writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time and the same may be dismissed.

2. In view of the statement so made, present writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. October 8, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : G.D. Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) :

(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Rajendra Kumar And Others .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Geeta Devi And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead